Peer Feedback

Year 2
STUDENT PEER FEEDBACK 

STUDENT: Annahita Mackee
GROUP MEMBER FEEDING BACK: Julia Tchoudinova
 

To what extent is there evidence of critical reflection and of analysis of progress?
Annahita reflected and analyzed her project very intensively and extensively.
 

Is there a clear alignment between the stated motivation and the research
question?
It is a very clear alignment between Annahita's motivation and her question.
 

To what extent is the proposed artefact testing process clearly aligned to the
research question?
I like that Annahita uses different approaches to test her artefact: by questionary,
phisically, online.
 

To what extent is content and communication, rather than aesthetic appeal or
eventual commercial goals, at the forefront of the research process?
It feels like Annahita's question is going deeper and deeper with her research and
iteration.
 

To what extent is there a clear indication that artefact testing is actually in
progress at the present time?
It is absolutely clear that Annahita is passionately carrying on both her research and
testing. It seems a good balance is there.
 

IN YOUR ESTIMATION WHAT ARE THE STRENGTHS OF THE PROJECT? 

Annahita's personal interest and passion in the subject. Her organsing skills and commitment. 

WHERE ARE THE GAPS IN, OR THREATS TO, THE PROJECT AS IT HAS BEEN
DESCRIBED TO YOU?  

I do not see any problem.