Peer Feedback

Year 2

25 January feedback proforma

STUDENT PEER FEEDBACK version

STUDENT: Annahita Mackee
GROUP MEMBER FEEDING BACK: Joseph Adjei

To what extent is there evidence of critical reflection and analysis of progress?

There is evidence of critical analysis and clearly explained progress and thinking. Steady artefact development

Is there a clear alignment between the stated motivation and research question?

There is alignment between motivation and questions and I believe it could be clearer when there is more convergence of the questions

To what extent is content and communication, rather than aesthetic appeal or eventual commercial goals, at the forefront of the research process?

Annahita is very clear in her report about communicating the research process. I think it’s a good trail.

To what extent is there a clear indication that artefact testing is actually in progress at the present time?

There is evidence of artefact iteration which has even helped refine the question

In your estimation:
What are the strengths of the project?
Where are the gaps in, or threats to, the project as it has been described to you? (no more than 3 of each, please)

I think your HOW is thorough, extensive and might open up other areas you can pick up after the course which I’ve mentioned earlier. Because as much as people like technology and development, identity could closely be linked to crafts and initiatives could even be proposed to governments who would like to preserve culture closely linked to crafts and its related skills.